DISC S, Agreeableness 75 — the same trait viewed through different lenses.
— · sharpness 50%
Emily Perina
—DISC · S· cousin · S— · sharpness 50%
DISC S, Agreeableness 75 — the same trait viewed through different lenses.
◉ voicederived · in Emily's voicefidelity 74%
plain · housederived · defaultfull character
01 · Where you are now
solid = now · dashed = prior
Where the lines sit now.
C · Conscientiousness
60
A · Agreeableness
73
N · Neuroticism
25
II
WHY — THE EVIDENCE
The frameworks that back the read.
04 · Big Five
How to read this
Five independent dimensions, each scored 0–100 against a population norm. A score is a rank, not a verdict — "high" means higher than most people, not better. Each dimension splits into two aspects that can pull opposite directions, which is why the factor number sometimes lies about who someone is. Tap any factor to learn what it means and how Emily lands on it.
The dot beside each aspect marks provenance: measured, converted from another framework, inferred.
Openness
—
Extraversion
—
Agreeableness
73
High
75
70
Conscientiousness
60
Moderately High
60
Neuroticism
25
Low
25
Openness
—
Extraversion
—
Agreeableness
High
73
75
70
Conscientiousness
Moderately High
60
60
Neuroticism
Low
25
25
06 · Tesseract
Emily Perina's vertex on the 4D hypercube
Each MBTI type is one of 16 corners. Coordinates [E/I, N/S, T/F, J/P] = [0,0,1,1].
Type coordinate: ENFP
07 · DISC
S
Steadiness
patient · reliable · team-minded
D · Dominance
direct · results-driven · decisive
I · Influence
outgoing · optimistic · persuasive
S · Steadiness
patient · reliable · team-minded
C · Conscientiousness
analytical · precise · systematic
III
WITH WHOM — THE CONSTELLATION
The people, and the distances between them.
08 · The dynamic
The shape of the gap between them.
Three numbers, one closing moment. The strongest declared edge loads by default. Chips below are the named connections; use the dropdown to compare Emily with anyone else on the site.
the dossier is the page now. Emily's profile is measured; the people around are converted from type. treat the reads as strong hypotheses, not verdicts.
